They were not even sworn in before they actively attacked
the salaries and remunerations board. MPigs, as they are aptly known on social
media are never going to be anything but the same variety of abject, pillaging
swine as their nickname implies.
It is of course very understandable that a successful
political aspirant would wish to recoup his financial investment in terms of
campaigning costs, it is very understandable. However, It is only in Kenya and
indeed it may even be an African phenomenon that one goes into government in
order to get rich. Everywhere else in the world, if one really desires to
enrich oneself they go into the private sector.
Why must I be forced to equivocate this; it is just absurd for
us as Kenyans to complain about how MPs are planning to attack the SRC and even
invent laws in order to increase their salaries when WE voted using the exact
same method of selection as in the last election!
I mean how dumb are we? How is it that we use our tribe and
personal interests when voting rather than a truly democratic and inclusive
national ideology and then turn around SHOCKED when the hyenas we voted for
bray for higher remunerations? “Insanity is doing the same thing over and over
again and expecting different results”. This is a quote ascribed to Albert
Einstein.
How pervasive is our self abuse when it comes to leadership?
Well. Look at our constitution. I admit that the average Kenyan may not be
educated enough to comprehensively understand the law as presented in the
constitution. BUT, no one has stopped you as a citizen from educating yourself
on this document. So the collective LAZINESS and lack of cognitive aspiration
(a level of plain stupidity) is what encumbers
us as a republic.
How serious is this situation? Well. This past week we were
privileged to observe on television the submissions by petitioners and their
respondents. Kenyans are so unlearned such that they cheer the lawyer for their
preferred party as though it is some sort of football match. We apply no
thought, no criticism and no critical thinking to what these lawyers are doing
at the Supreme Court. Just like the intellectual juveniles we really are, we
applaud people whose legal grasp is kindergarten level just because they
consistently use redundancies like “my lord” and “your honor”.
And then there is the panel of judges of the court. A
personal friend and true astute jurist put it best:
"The
problem is that many Kenyans cannot discern between "authoritative" and
"authoritarian". So, when a body like the Supreme Court TRIES not to
appear authoritarian like a bad overbearing primary school principal
(although that style, plus a frequent application of 20 of the best, is
what virtually all those monkeys masking as "senior counsels" do
seriously need), they fall into the other extreme, and lose all judicial
authority and direction.
If you have watched the bench, they continuously behave like a gaggle of insecure 13-years-old schoolgirls. Body language, helpless smiles, mindless giggling. And with approximately the same degree of legal knowledge." Alexander Eichener, jurist, Germany.
If you have watched the bench, they continuously behave like a gaggle of insecure 13-years-old schoolgirls. Body language, helpless smiles, mindless giggling. And with approximately the same degree of legal knowledge." Alexander Eichener, jurist, Germany.
How deeply rooted our complex problem is then. That we, as
the astute electorate are so decidedly ignorant, and yes that WAS a decision we
made, such that we cannot tell when an injustice is about to be delivered.
What is indeed our collective dilemma? That fundamentally,
our constitution is so weakly ascribing to justice. Take this reality into
consideration. That any presidential petition at the Supreme Court is
essentially NEVER going to receive even the remotest sort of judicial response
it deserves. The most obvious example I can give is this: the time frame given
for presidential petitions to be presented and heard. (oh! The saddest part is
the indulgence in megalomania that Willy Mutunga did, as he decided arbitrarily
and unconstitutionally that petitions presented to the Supreme Court regardless
of the time they were presented are deemed as to have been presented on the
LAST day thus happily reducing the time for deliberations; yes Sir, you may be
the CZAR of Kenya but when you change the constitution as such you have
COMPLETELY overstepped your mandate, SIR!) So, the time frame has been
constituted as to be so short such that even comprehensive or rather wide
affidavits as the CORD lawyers presented were thrown out on the basis that
there is NO time to examine those affidavits. Is this justice? Of course not!
I pity us. How much trust and hope we
laid at the feet of these intellectual 13-year-olds. That even Supreme
Court Justice Mohammed Ibrahim went as far as to essentially admit in an
obiter dictum, that because of the time contraints imposed by the law,
there is a near impossibility of any actual juridical response as
regards any presidential petition.
We have no REAL jurists in this country, mostly because of a general lack of true fundamental education, but also because we do not extend ourselves as a nation and because we ever so readily accept utter mediocrity. The one (1) internationally acclaimed and widely respected constitutional jurist and scholar that Kenya has, and who offered his help, was purposely excluded by the court, and not even listened to at all: ignoring professor Yash Pal Ghai has underscored our failures.
My final words are these: that regardless of the eventual outcome of the Supreme Court decision, true justice was certainly not served here.
We have no REAL jurists in this country, mostly because of a general lack of true fundamental education, but also because we do not extend ourselves as a nation and because we ever so readily accept utter mediocrity. The one (1) internationally acclaimed and widely respected constitutional jurist and scholar that Kenya has, and who offered his help, was purposely excluded by the court, and not even listened to at all: ignoring professor Yash Pal Ghai has underscored our failures.
My final words are these: that regardless of the eventual outcome of the Supreme Court decision, true justice was certainly not served here.